Replies to post #113189 on Aurora Acquisition Corp (AURC)

[dcervan123]

Yes, I think we need a translation????????????????

I think this is a Proposed Rule Change...

[lostinstocks]

I don't know , what do you think? ("EmilyS"??)

[KELLYCO]

Looks like we will finally get to clear the air about air shares here.
13 day buy in mandate to cover is the way I see it.
And the short mm's are suppose to file what they have done.
This is nothing more than evidence gathering.
I will give another example.
Companies are suppose to file with finra when they have a corporate action such as paying of a dividend.
The filed form is what separates a fraudulant action from a legit action.
And when caught the absence of the filing is the evidence of the fraud.
I would suspect that the really crooked brokers have a double booking system that hides shares that they sold and did not cover.
Kinda like their own little money printing press.
I would love to see you guys have a run on shares here at Aurus so you don't have to take a huge loss.
But I would not buy shares hoping to be part of something that may turn into another pump and dump based on the short squeeze senario that may or may not happen.
The reason I say it may not be a short squeeze at all because the only difference is that there is a time limit and a filing requirement.There are thousands of brokers that can just file locators and cover their broker buddies ass.
And if there is such an occurance then expect Aurus Corp to become active status again to raise the OS and sell shares to the locators.After all, Aurus Corp shell is for selling shares.