InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Popo1

02/19/11 9:14 AM

#2007 RE: choctaw 02 #2006

Also Choctaw - from GoHaynesville: Jeff has posted many interesting tidbits over last few months.

Reply by jeff boler 1 hour ago
I believe that my last comment was misinterpreted, due to my poor writing skills. The point that I was pushing was that Chesapeake has no way of knowing how their North Louisiana Wells will be performing decades down the road. I was referring to Chesapeake's arrogance. It was not my intent to say that any participants of this board were arrogant for applying Chesapeake's estimates, though I don't think such an exercise would yield accurate numbers. That said, reservoir engineering is very similar to astronomy in that anything within an order of magnitude is considered close...

I agree with Paul that the natural fracture system is key to making the geology of the Buena Vista Project so attractive. The natural fractures as previously stated will provide excess storage capacity and permeability, both of which are quite valuable and rare in reservoirs of this type. Also, I speculate that the natural fracture system will provide a unique stage for a synthetic frac-job. The post-completion drainage basin for these wells could be quite extensive.

The pore-pressure of the reservoir is another unique aspect which vastly increases storage capacity. The pores of the shale and natural fracture volume will hold more gas than it would under lesser pressures, as it is more compressed. It is important to remember that natural gas exists as a liquid in the reservoir, but liquid methane is a compressible fluid - If I remember correctly this is governed by the Rackett Equation. In addition to another means of increasing the reservoir storage capacity, the pressure will also push the natural gas through smaller pores and tighter fractures than would be possible under lesser pressures. This will also lead to an increased size of the well's drainage basin.

The greater the size (volume) of the drainage basin of a particular well, the longer it will take for the reservoir pressure to deplete. This will lend for flatter decline curves with respect to production rates and fewer wells required to drain the reservoir. Also, a higher percentage of the 'Free Gas' will be recoverable.

In summary, both the storage capacity and size of drainage basins are going to be uniquely favorable to high, prolonged production. Fewer wells will be required to produce the leasehold, which will increase the profitability of the project.

I maintain that with all of the information avaliable to the architects of this project (everything from cuttings to well-logs), ground would have never been broken on the Burkley-Phillips#1 unless the numbers added up to profit. Profit at current gas prices...

icon url

Popo1

02/19/11 9:35 AM

#2008 RE: choctaw 02 #2006

Another tidbit from GoHaynesville:

Reply by Flip Phillips 18 hours ago
I'm pretty sure they are waiting for special production pipe (for high pressure gas) to be shipped from overseas. No one makes it here in the states.

Reply by rusell shleby 18 hours ago
Heard the same, something to do with HCL of some kind of chemical that will decompose the pipe over time?

Add in 20K+ pressure, likely H2S & spring floods, we start to see one aspect of why MNLU not in a hurry to release results. Completion / IP will definitely be June/July time frame if above post correct. These are both lease-holders from area.
icon url

geopressure

02/20/11 12:02 AM

#2013 RE: choctaw 02 #2006

I like the way that your thinking Mr. Choctaw, and I do hope that we are able to produce wet gas or condensate...

However; Time, Pressure, and Temperature all tend to drive the complex organic molecules from the plankton deposited within the shale toward smaller and smaller hydrocarbons. This process terminates once the organics have been converted to methane, aka natural gas [CH4], as there are no more carbon-bonds to break. Increased Pressure, Temperature, or length of Time would all tend to encourage a reservoir comprised of ever increasing percentage of methane - and methane has the lowest BTU value because again there are no more carbon-bonds to be broken via combustion to release extra energy.

Ethane [C2H6], Propane [C3H8], Butane [C4H10], etc... all contain more and more BTU's. The presence of the these molecules, even in small quantities would yield a 'wet' gas and increased revenue from the well as the gas as a whole is more valuable due to it's higher energy content, or the propane or butane could be separated and sold separately. Hydrocarbon molecules larger than Hexane tend to form liquids at standard temperature and pressure and are highly valuable as they are very near the components of gasoline.

I have logs from three different wells that all logged high concentrations of all the hydrocarbons mentioned above while drilling through these formations (Bossier & Haynesville Shales) at similar depths (though the temperature is higher in the Burkley-Phillips#1 Well. I would post one of the logs if I knew how... Perhaps I can post it on GoHaynesvilleShale.com...