If her lab did tests with NNVC and they were as amazing as the claims on this board predict, why would she have to stay "independent" in her assessment? She is the foremost expert and champion of finding a "cure" or treatment for a disease she has spent her life fighting. Wouldn't she be inclined to shout from the mountain tops that her lab did work with a 'functional cure"? Announcing honest results is an independent assessment. Unless of course, she was paid by NNVC and her results are suspect because of the company paying her. But that didn't happen...did it?
I find it hard to believe that she would not be enthusiastic about this, assuming it actually works. But when you assume...