InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

lemon

01/30/11 3:18 PM

#69990 RE: MFridge #69984

lol Those claimimg massive short are long gone from here. Just like Pino, Cerda and Pillay are long gone.

THe short theroy posters where like the opposite to posters claiming scam. I think some tried to balance out the hype from both sides. Hyping scam versus the 100 billion short hype. Neither hype claim has been proven so we should move forward and not dwell so much on who said what but what will happen going forward.

What is the reason for touting scam 24/7? To scare people away so there is no buying? Promises of huge gains? By posters? And people should beleive 10,000 to 40,000% gain promises by anonymous posters? Just like people should believe the scam posters theories?

The company has not been touting huge gain claims and it's been posted that folks should rely on what the company states as reliable info. lol I know, that's kind of silly knowing what has happened to date with Paychest, but it is a sticky note.
icon url

superstop

01/31/11 11:46 AM

#70039 RE: MFridge #69984

mfridge, your response to my post to lakers is nothing but a spin.
I asked the one making the claim there is no short to prove it.
You said the one or one's making the claim there is a short to prove it-- You ran those posters off,, they can't prove anything. so therefore and regardless of what someone else said, lakers has said for years there is no way there is a short position. Therefore the poster claiming there isn't has the burden on him to prove what he states.
You said you don't recall the naysayers telling anyone to sell. I haven't either, well not in a direct way, there has been a lot of propaganda about it. I have read all the posts from the naysayers claiming and trying to convince people the PPS will never go past .0002 or .0003 or there will NEVER be a bid again,
the only reason to claim without proof there is no short is to discourage or discount the interest in a company, so a shorter can lower his risk to cover his short position.

So who exactly is it that's trying to manipulate PYCT?
I think that question is something a MOD should mod , and not be so naysayerish about, that itself ask another question.