InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Personalizit

01/22/11 4:55 PM

#223642 RE: Poptech #223637

"So, good news, Cline sees upside for NEOM."

You don't know that. He could need to sell ALL because of some personal reasons.
icon url

JB6

01/22/11 6:23 PM

#223646 RE: Poptech #223637

WOW pop your insight is outstanding.

Thanks again - Jim
icon url

Daytrader40years

01/24/11 8:47 AM

#223680 RE: Poptech #223637

Thanks for explaining that PoP

on this Board. There are a lot of people here that don't realize that investing in a Fund is like putting money in the bank. If you put money in the bank savings deposit for a percentage gain, then the bank loans money to someone else to buy a car, the title then goes to the bank to hold until the car is paid off.

If you then want your deposit back, and the bank don’t have the cash to give you back, they can give you the title to hold in lieu of the cash. They just don’t sell the other persons car and give you your cash back.

Depending on the agreement with the bank, and the borrower of the money that bought the car, you can sell the title to another financing company (stock market), or make a reduced deal for pay back with the person that bought the car (Neomedia).

Who knows what Cline did? He may have lent the money to YA at 12%, YA loaned the money to Neomedia for 16% and when he wanted his deposit back after the period he gained his 12%, all he got was the title.

I feel that what he is doing, would be the same thing anyone that posts on these Boards would do if they had the ability to do it.

I think they call it capitalism, and I call it a buying opportunity. I feel Cline is in the money lending business and not in the NEOM security gathering business. I also feel that he is holding the balance of his shares for a sale at a near future run up of the PPS. So am I and I think so are a lot of the other people that post on this Board.
icon url

codes4real

01/24/11 11:45 AM

#223681 RE: Poptech #223637

So, good news, Cline sees upside for NEOM.



What do we see as the upside of Cline? He's still dumping daily into the market.

Edit: sorry Pop, catching up on weekend posts...I see you already answered this exact same question.
icon url

Vercingetorix

01/24/11 12:05 PM

#223682 RE: Poptech #223637

The problem for us is - if the NEOM market cap is $2 million and Cline thinks it should be valued at $10 or 20 million, then as demand increases he can sell shares into the float in such a manner that the share price remains stagnant or falls while the market capitalization increases. This is the reason why investors are so skittish about investing (or investing more) in Neomedia.
icon url

cloud3

01/24/11 12:42 PM

#223684 RE: Poptech #223637

Interesting take on it. I never quite understand these types of filings and what they mean to the shareholder. Sounds a bit reassuring but then again, I've been re-assured multiple times on this long road from the upper left to the lower right.

Confusion reigns.
icon url

juliefema

01/26/11 9:11 AM

#223744 RE: Poptech #223637

RE: "The sell-off on the 18th was not due to Cline. It was due to the entity which transferred him the shares - the only other shareholder with that large of an ownership position."

How are you so sure that the selling was "due to the entity which transferred him the shares" and why would it have Cline's name on it?

Thanks so much for your insightful posts. Any evidence or reason you can provide to further prove your statement would be greatly appreciated. Should it be true now would be an excellent time to buy. But hey so were many other times, supposedly, right? lol