Replies to post #302868 on Sulja Bros. Building Supplies, Ltd (SLJB)

[Hockmir]

The earliest posted copy of that document that I can point you to was on an anti-Sulja site, and was originally posted on 23 April 2007 at 02:43.

http://liveweb.waybackmachine.org/http://www.suljabrossucks.com/docs/OSC.Anderson.pdf

I hope this helps you proceed in your inquiry. If there was a breach of procedure or improper release of evidence, it would certainly reflect poorly on the abilities and motivations of the enforcement agencies involved.

[EarnestDD]

After all this time ... over four years ... suddenly we should be concerned that some clerk in the OSC's offices might have wrongly released information proving that SLJB was a scam???

And this helps investors bilked out of their money... how??
jmo

[janniebgood]

I haven't read the posts that came after this one, but you missed the point of the passage you posted; if you will read it again, it does not say that the AFFIDAVIT is sealed and not available for public review, but rather:

the original exhibits attached to the Affidavit
of Tom Anderson containing the personal information are sealed and not available for public review