co. is completely legit and while over the 2+ years i've had doubts if they would survive (ex is fall 2008) imo etc *ensures* expo's survivability
for a fact it was developed/tested and tweaked for X .. for a fact 100M at full penetration requires 25M in capital .. not happening with a pps at .0001 .. which is why i'm expecting a r/s and co. being taken private in '11
as for investors in exph buying here
if they aren't .. who is? there are 5 MMs' showing even if 2 of them are *bogus* 3 aren't including the 2 *PRIMARY* via VOLUME IN EXPH in 2010 and .. er .. 2009 :0
i'm an investor in the co. and i can't get filled at bid .. :) .. and i rarely play their game of resetting by hitting the ask on any legit co. including expo
i'm content with what i currently hold if my bid gets filled at .0001 so be it and if exph goes no bid (and my DD shows me *risk* is outweighed by potential reward) which so far so good .. i'll double my shares
no need for further dialog .. i have zero interest or intent regarding mindsets .. imo folks requiring clarity should indeed wait for mgmt's transparency