Replies to post #306042 on InterDigital Inc (IDCC)

[jeffree]

Personally...I wouldn't mind...



if Nokia Did try to drag this out...just a little bit more...
and then lose...and have to pay an exorbitant rate...

for all they have put IDCC and us shareholders thru for all those years...[


C'mon Big Bucks...!!!


lol



"let the Wheel of Fortune spin"...!!!



jmfo
(thanks to all who contribute here)


...jk...

[hock1]

I.Q.... I see things very much the same as you with regard to today's events and their ramifications. What I have never fully understood is the notion that Nokia will have to pay a higher rate with each ensuing loss in the courts. Why can't they just go the distance and, when they ultimately have lost, just say "Okay now we'll pay the same as Samsung"? I know you're not a lawyer, but perhaps someone on the board can answer that.

[warbil]

IQ,

I thought it was also telling when ITC counsel Valentine kept saying that codes were not required to spread anything and that IDCC's short codes didn't spread anything. That seemed to fly in the face of the claims construction adopted by Luckern that all codes referenced by IDCC were spreading codes and performed a spreading function.

If I am not mistaken, at that point, didn't one of the Judges ask if that wasn't the argument IDCC was trying to make? Nokia counsel Flynn had to be coming out of his chair by then. Nokia has pulled out some miracles in these proceedings but this one will be hard to dig out of.

Given the tone of the hearing today, Nokia will still not settle unless a cease and desist is ordered. I hope it comes soon.