InvestorsHub Logo

roadog

01/13/11 10:43 AM

#223042 RE: edc #223034

FWIW...EDC..I agree..

jeffz2

01/13/11 11:39 AM

#223045 RE: edc #223034

IMO he appeared to be a very stand up person but he did not 'apparently' succeed at any of the objectives he claimed to shareholders ( particularly alternative financing) but for reasons I will not mention on this board, he outright lied and insulted whether he realized it or not.

And I have pondered that his departure was shrouded in some moral dilemma he eventually could no longer stomach - probably once he truly realized how wide he opened the door for YA and screwed over sh with the particulars of the r/s
No question for me at this point that the r/s was for YAs benefit only at the peril of sh

Even looking back to the revised 8 mil debenture where we all believed the motive was because something was coming over the horizon.
Well just look back at what came over that horizon, YA was able to rewrite the deal and lend the same money with much better terms for YA.

Or IM was simply a victim of YA games on suppressing the price prior the eBay news.

Who knows - certainly not sh

My biggest mistake here was remaining too focused on the visionaries which I still think some are on track, but instead should have paid more attention to the days to day realities.

And not that I was not warned - Jonsie warned me - among others - but I did not head their warnings and now I have paid the price. And that is my personal issue!!!

But as Roger Daltry belched out as Walsh and company played their tune -

" Won't get fooled again " !!!!!