My understanding is that there is an offer on the table. (I know one was made in an original letter prior to the state case but am not sure how much it has been ammended) At least the original letter would provide a starting point for negotiations but you need two parties to negotiate and you always want to be the one negotiating from strenght to afford yourself the best deal. At this point (and i could be wrong) I have not seen any willingness from the Daic camp to come to the table and negotiate. I would assume that they either feel they will win and dont need to negotiate or that they are waiting and looking for an opportunity to try and negotiate from a position of strength. If it were me, I would keep pushing off the trial and wait for a T-Mobile and try and settle at that point.
Settlement might work under favorable terms. Agreeing to payout the terms of the 2008 agreement when Daic clearly interfered( my opinion based upon what I have read) is not really a settlement. The problem is there doesnt seem to be any terms offered by the Daic parties (if there are I am unaware but would love to see them).
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
