InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

jhdf51

12/18/10 11:51 AM

#264863 RE: wamuvoodoo #264853

One thing I can agree with is no trial. Nelson made a mockery out of those he questioned and Susman and Nelson would destroy the debtors with their questioning. No one would have their story straight...because there is no truth in their story.
icon url

Cashbuilder

12/18/10 12:04 PM

#264864 RE: wamuvoodoo #264853

Voodoo I agree but.....

If for no other reason than full and complete public disclosure
Those docs should be unsealed and made public. IMO

Nash
icon url

fsshon

12/18/10 3:22 PM

#264898 RE: wamuvoodoo #264853

Yes Voodoo, I agree most people do get that a trial will be long, grueling and a waste of the courts and the estates resources, so Yes.. I do get it..

The problem is she has to convince the resisting parties to negotiate with Equity and that is not easy to do.. She can use the derivative approach if she wants to exert pressure on the hedgies and PIERS.

So Yes, she does want a Settlement by the end of the year.

~Don~