InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

player1234

03/19/05 12:23 PM

#74405 RE: buffetguy #74403

That is from 2003.

Note the date/time: "08/01/03 12:38 PM PT "
icon url

buffetguy

03/19/05 12:24 PM

#74406 RE: buffetguy #74403

OH! It's an old article but put on current edition...........

of MacNewsWorld.

Still good stuff.

sorry about that...................
icon url

upside rite

03/19/05 12:41 PM

#74409 RE: buffetguy #74403

buffet... interesting to see an old article 08/03 recently (yesterday) reprinted. seems that is good. Ah? ps I love that. OH MY Gawd comment. Your excitement is heartwarming if not outstanding`! Good day Rbt.
icon url

Zuke

03/19/05 1:33 PM

#74416 RE: buffetguy #74403

buffetguy,

Although the article is a "reprint", it's still a nice find.

The industry is desperate for a security solution. We will continue to see more and more press related to this topic. Most people don't have a clue who wave is, or how they can help.

The reprint contributes to the education process.

Have a good weekend!

Zuke
icon url

Vacationhouse

03/19/05 9:51 PM

#74434 RE: buffetguy #74403

OH MY GAWD!


TECH WORLD has the same Wave/INTEL article today too!

OLD articles are all around us!

: ))
http://www.technewsworld.com/story/31251.html

Thanks, but we saw them years ago, but thanks.

: ))

just joking with ya!


FWIW Many of the publications show Todays date on any page you pull up. YOu must look at the date of the article in your research to find what matters.

If you go to the main page of Your Mac Publication you will find nothing WAVY. If you look in the past weeks/archves you will only find one article mentioning Wave which was already posted here by DDD.

And.... if you go back further you will find a My Publish article from 1999 with today's date on it. The pages update. This is absolutely normal. Do some research and read something that isn't from today and that is what you will see. NOTHING to get excited about. The only people seeing that Wave Intel article is you and the people that read your Excited post. Sorry, nothing alarming here.

FWIW IMHO ECT.

VH