InvestorsHub Logo

joenatural

12/15/10 11:29 AM

#63477 RE: pmony5 #63472

TSTC/GRRF - I'm not sure why opposing points of view have to be classified as arguments. That word's kind of harsh IMO. As far as GRRF being compared with TSTC, I totally agree and acknowledge the huge AR's. I think a short position (I'm not short at the moment) in GRRF is warranted for sure, even with their big revenue forecast for Q-4 and I don't think that TSTC shorts are shaking in their boots as shorts would be in YONG, UTA & CCME ......

"TSTC we all can argue that the terms suck the contracts with the big 3 but they use their size to take advantage of the smaller players... Like I stated GRRF has like 220 Mill $$$ in A/R's & Comba well over 300 Mill $$$$ as those 2 are public co.s ... If it were a TSTC specific problem I would agree 100% ... TSTC gets paid according to contracts & also found out the way the telcos delay some more is to take their time inspecting projects adding more time to the 12 month payment deal & TSTC gets 10% of service $$$ held for 2 Years... YES the terms suck but TSTC has always gotten paid & imo will continue to get paid from these giant tier 1 Telcos as they have NO reason to beat TSTC GRRF or Comba ...."