InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 657
Posts 24624
Boards Moderated 2
Alias Born 07/16/2006

Re: pmony5 post# 63472

Wednesday, 12/15/2010 11:29:56 AM

Wednesday, December 15, 2010 11:29:56 AM

Post# of 94785
TSTC/GRRF - I'm not sure why opposing points of view have to be classified as arguments. That word's kind of harsh IMO. As far as GRRF being compared with TSTC, I totally agree and acknowledge the huge AR's. I think a short position (I'm not short at the moment) in GRRF is warranted for sure, even with their big revenue forecast for Q-4 and I don't think that TSTC shorts are shaking in their boots as shorts would be in YONG, UTA & CCME ......

"TSTC we all can argue that the terms suck the contracts with the big 3 but they use their size to take advantage of the smaller players... Like I stated GRRF has like 220 Mill $$$ in A/R's & Comba well over 300 Mill $$$$ as those 2 are public co.s ... If it were a TSTC specific problem I would agree 100% ... TSTC gets paid according to contracts & also found out the way the telcos delay some more is to take their time inspecting projects adding more time to the 12 month payment deal & TSTC gets 10% of service $$$ held for 2 Years... YES the terms suck but TSTC has always gotten paid & imo will continue to get paid from these giant tier 1 Telcos as they have NO reason to beat TSTC GRRF or Comba ...."

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.