InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

jobynimble

12/01/10 7:42 PM

#79519 RE: Scandle34 #79518

air permits also apply to VOC emissions due to evaporation and preesure relieve venting of storage tanks, etc. Therefore, while the 10Q implies what you and Z say, it does not clearly state it and there are alternate interpretations.

My 2 cents - if it was a P2O permit it would have been much more strongly worded.




Agreed...


icon url

Zardiw

12/01/10 7:58 PM

#79520 RE: Scandle34 #79518

From the 10Q. Interpret it as you will. To me it says that Canada has issued an air permit:

who have already obtained the necessary operating permits required for P2O.

one of the Company's facilities recently obtained it’s air approval.

October 15, 2010 that the Ontario Ministry of Environment registered a “certificate of Approval for Air, Section 9, EPA” in the Company’s name.

“Certificate of Approval for Air” in Ontario is equivalent to a NYDEC Air Permit in the United States.

The stack test confirmed that the P2O processor emissions are far below maximum emissions allowed under a DEC simple air permit and consequently confirmed that the only air permit we require for the process is a simple air permit.

z
icon url

Rawnoc

12/01/10 8:17 PM

#79522 RE: Scandle34 #79518

While you are probably correct, we have an industry expert poster on here who claims/thinks the stack test data can be transffered and getting an amendment on the air permit to allow for P2O would be a pretty simple process in Canada. He seems to believe that the initial stack test for this single processor was a game changer.

All that said, I do find it a bit too "coincidental" that the DEC claims to have gotten their final stack test numbers on October 6 and the air permit in Canada was granted nine (9) days later. It could just be a coincidence or they didn't bother to register it until after a successful final data number stack test.....who knows.

Bottom line is I see rapid expansion coming following JBII beginning commercial production in NY shortly.