It doesn't, obviously. Hence it's an attempt to make a mountain out of a molehill which is what lawyers do and those silly enough to fall for it.
Johnik Share Tuesday, November 23, 2010 9:58:55 PM
Re: scion post# 78279 Post # of 78305
But aren't those two different beasts, so to speak? Please correct me if I am wrong, but I thought "stock promotion" for purposes of SEC violations generally consisted of promoting a stock to the public in order to sell shares on the open market at an inflated price. How does offering stock to an employee as part compensation for services rendered fit within the "stock promotion" characterization?