InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

SlyOne

11/16/10 12:43 PM

#253524 RE: MONICALAW #253523

IMO: Not connected, Sussman didnt dump us


Fact: Rosenusuck spoke directly with 2 Members of the EC.
Fact: 2 members resigned from EC.

icon url

jhdf51

11/16/10 12:44 PM

#253526 RE: MONICALAW #253523

<and SUSSMAN has totally dumped us> What makes you say that?
icon url

gophilipgo

11/16/10 12:44 PM

#253527 RE: MONICALAW #253523

POR objections aren't due until 11/19.

I think people really need to keep their emotions in check until then, at the very least.
icon url

knick

11/16/10 12:45 PM

#253529 RE: MONICALAW #253523

Most of us have been dead wrong all along settlement,rosen,examiner ect ect So hopefully we are wrong about susman.
icon url

WithCatz

11/16/10 6:18 PM

#253593 RE: MONICALAW #253523

You are wrong. I personally know better. (And I will not go further).

The timing was purely coincidental, and they had no knowledge (as we didn't) that the ER report would be what it was.

Being on the EC is a huge personal/family drain, and huge financial drain (non-compensated position) -- and this case has drug on. You could only imagine what an employer has been saying to these common people about their profound commitment in time to this case.

Please stop with your assumptions. Had the ER report gone the other way, you would be speculating the opposite direction.

...Catz