Replies to post #39130 on Calypso Wireless (fka CLYW)

[Sheepdog]

It would not be the same judge if transferred as that judge lost relection.

HOWEVER, Daic/WQilliamson appear to want to claim a default of an agreement that was dismissed w/prejudice (as you note) in district 151 and that mandates the action to 151 as far as I can tell.

All I know is that Calypso lost its lawyer in a case less than 6 months old that had no previous delays and it was very prejudicial for the court to not grant a continuance thereto.

Also, Jimmy kept the pressure on Calypso with his constant chants of "a company may not represent itself pro se" and that is exactly what he has been doing the whole time and ALSO representing another defendant thus frustrating Calypso's discovery process. Being both a defendant and lawyer everything is "attorney client"

This judge has to go IMO

[HighRider]

The same judge is not there. I'm not sure it effects the bottom line as to what Calypso has to lose or Daic has to gain, but if Markle wants it I say we need it. Maybe it makes it easier to admit the earlier evidence, I'm sure the judge would determine how far back they can go. According to the Local Rules it's pretty clear it needs to transfer and now the excuse of a trial date within 2 weeks is not relevant.