It would not be the same judge if transferred as that judge lost relection.
HOWEVER, Daic/WQilliamson appear to want to claim a default of an agreement that was dismissed w/prejudice (as you note) in district 151 and that mandates the action to 151 as far as I can tell.
All I know is that Calypso lost its lawyer in a case less than 6 months old that had no previous delays and it was very prejudicial for the court to not grant a continuance thereto.
Also, Jimmy kept the pressure on Calypso with his constant chants of "a company may not represent itself pro se" and that is exactly what he has been doing the whole time and ALSO representing another defendant thus frustrating Calypso's discovery process. Being both a defendant and lawyer everything is "attorney client"
This judge has to go IMO
I have no humble opinions, but I do have opinions and those are what I express in my posts. BUT...I have been wrong before and likely will be wrong again so do your own research and don't blame me if you are too lazy to do so.
