InvestorsHub Logo

Lottalead

11/13/10 7:45 AM

#39123 RE: wampuscat #39122

Yes it does seem that way...Markle also requested an emergency oral hearing that the judge has not ruled on or scheduled. It seems he wants the written response first before doing anything further.

ooag_long

11/13/10 8:36 PM

#39125 RE: wampuscat #39122

ty wampuscat, im struggling to get info wherever it may be rendered so your effort is much appreciated.

HighRider

11/13/10 8:56 PM

#39126 RE: wampuscat #39122

I think the posts on the board were from the settings section not the images section that actually listed the document the judge signed. I don't think anyone has talked about that possibility of the judge still ruling on the transfer due to 3.2.1 or that the Daic parties have until monday to provide information as to why they don't want it transferred. It seems pretty clear it should be transferred and this section is more clearly related than the other section 3.2.2. So we'll probably know something on that by the end of next week maybe. I don't think it matters much, but if Markle is requesting it, it must be of some significance. I think it will be transferred. Markle will then probably try to disqualify again in the new district court once it's transferred. So we're really back where we were before victory was declared, except we now have an insider buy of a substantial number of shares ($26k not $3k). I look for .12 over the next three weeks. This stock isn't going down anytime soon.

Sheepdog

11/13/10 11:48 PM

#39127 RE: wampuscat #39122

Local rule 3.2.1:


3.2.1 Prior Judgment. Any claim for relief based upon a prior judgment shall be assigned to the court of original judgment.



Daic's claim is to enforce the original judgment and to enforce the turnover order of the original judgment.

Hmmmm....How could the judge NOT transfer it. This judge concerns me GREATLY. Markle IS doing his job.

.