InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

never-again

11/04/10 7:43 AM

#249490 RE: diamondguru-one #249475

AGREE! , very though provoking and

timely release of that info.

There were actually 560-ish branches involved with that TD deal, or approximately 1/4 of WAMU's banking operations. 30 billion offer for just a fraction of WAMU,

I don't think that 30 B included all of the subs and holding company assets! ! ! !


Non accountant math :
30 B x 4 = 120 billion
+ x for subs
+ y for holding company assets
---------------------

FDIC supplied a number of $ 258,xxx,xxx,xxx.00 transferred to jpm.
icon url

ptolomeo

11/04/10 8:10 AM

#249505 RE: diamondguru-one #249475

I think this TD stuff goes nowhere.

They were only "moderately interested". Now proof it.

How come we didn't know about this until now, more than two years later? I think the Banco de Santander issue has more weight than this.

Good luck
icon url

sf

11/04/10 2:54 PM

#249801 RE: diamondguru-one #249475

diamond, did you get your ballot? i have a question. on the opt out clause it is very much double speak. if you check the box you are not opting out. but the box says "opt out".and if you leave it blank you are allowing a release of liability. which is it? i've left messages at susmans office to please clarify this clause. do you know what should be done?