InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

gdsgds

11/03/10 12:40 PM

#31153 RE: kimble1 #31152

I desagree, the consultant will take their fee, file for the application and make their profits regardless approved or not. No one is guarantee a 100% approval...
icon url

adrian taylor

11/03/10 12:41 PM

#31154 RE: kimble1 #31152

Dean is protecting himself from prosecution by not showing us images. There is no other logical reason why he wouldn't. Either the real time feature is unattainable or the rad dose is too high. Real time and low rad does is what we have been sold on........with one or both of these features missing, renders the DViS obsolete.
icon url

pendragon8062

11/03/10 12:46 PM

#31155 RE: kimble1 #31152

Truth is we have no idea what characteristics led to the NSE except for what Dean has told us. Unless we see the letter, we might never know.

I've worked on numerous government projects where something is rejected because Paragraph 3 should be Paragrpah 57 and although you recieved guidance from the government agency approving Paragrpah 3 as Paragrpah 3, some other bureacrat comes along, says its wrong, and rejects it. It would be comical if it weren't such a waste of taxpayer time and money.

Not saying there is nothing fundamentally wrong with the DVIS, but to attribute NSE to the machine is assuming facts not in evidence at this point in time.