Replies to post #2684 on Sunergy, Inc. (fka SNEY)

[djpm3]

SIMPLY HUGE TODAY WILL BE A HUGE DAY!! GLTA

[gold56]

so you're saying they will mine everything in a 12 month period?
PE ratios are derived from using a one year time frame

[ximon]

EVERYONE MUST READ Valuation, post by Sterling! Must be pasted at the top! Just amazingly huge!!! Thanks a whole lot!! xi

[MNYC]

Just a honest question, stervc, how do you expect it to trade in dollar-land without a R/S? God forbid they pull that...

[Kooka_Duke]

""Absolutely Brilliant""

[Intivestor]

Excellent information. Mods, please sticky this.

[ximon]

Everybody must read POST, HUGE SNEY Confirmation & Valuation by Stervc, and you will understand why this is a very strong buy! xi

[Codesters]

your boasting on your posting is worthless??? $3 bucks to $6 bucks lol

First prove to me theres a Allied Mining and Supply, LLC?

If there is then I will buy in and help that PPS go up.

[Long22]

$2,321,428,200 Revenues x .46 Net Profit Margin = $1,067,856,972 Net Profit

Now let’s derive an Earnings Per Share (EPS) using an OS of 2 billion shares:

$1,067,856,972 Net Profit ÷ 2,000,000,000 (OS) = EPS
.53 = EPS

Now, to determine where SNEY should be fundamentally trading upon the closing of this acquisition, let’s use a lower and more conservative Price to Earnings (P/E) Ratio of 12 to use as the multiple or the growth rate for the Industry or Sector of which SNEY trades up under:

12 P/E Ratio x .53 EPS = SNEY Fundamental Share Price of Trading
$6.36 = SNEY Fundamental Share Price of Trading

This means that when the closure of SNEY acquiring 100% of Allied Mining and Supply, LLC, it should ”fundamentally” trade at $6.36 per share.

I’m not saying that SNEY will go to $6.36 per share immediately or if it would ever get to $6.36 per share, but I am simply saying that SNEY is still significantly undervalued at these levels, especially if they close the acquisition. Even if you max out the AS to be the OS to use with this equation, you would still get SNEY to be trading at a fundamental share price of still north of $3.00+ per share.

[patchman]

Below are some other companies within the area that could be used as a future gage for confirming the magnitude of SNEY’s location of properties:

AU:NYSE @ $45.00+ per share:
www.anglogold.co.za/default.htm

GSS:AMEX@$4.00+ per share
http://www.gsr.com/

GOLD:NASDAQ@$91.00+ per share
http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=GOLD

IAG:NYSE@17.00+ per share
http://www.iamgold.com/

ABX:NYSE@46.00+ per share
http://www.barrick.com/

Doesn't PPS have something to do with share structure and more importantly, profitability? What does a $91.00 stock have to do with another trading at $4.00 or one trading at $0.0076? Answer - NOTHING!!!!

Because I have a car dealership right down the street from the largest car dealer in the nation doesn't mean I am guaranteed to be the second largest car dealer in the nation. If you own land that allows you to tap into oil, can you drill everywhere and hit the motherload? Nope!

There is a reason these big name firms are big and SNEY isn't. There is also a reason why they didn't acquire the land SNEY did.

[Funaboard]

WOW.... Great info!!!

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=56018080

[cabir]

lets ......go----- :-)