Replies to post #79790 on 8000 Incorporated (EIGH)

[Toxic Avenger]

At least one of your statements is dead wrong;
"Trying to suggest the lack of size on the reported short positions is meaningful is ludicrous and everyone reading this board knows it".

I read the board and I think that the naked short story is ludicrous, with the reported short position being correct.

Particularly telling is how the NSS relies on the accuracy of the daily Reg Sho report, but then relies on the absence of EIGH from the Reg Sho Threshold security list, which is based on the same Reg Sho data, being a mistake.

[Dogfish Head]

Alan, you've inspired me, I'm going to pay to get my EIGH certificates. In fact, if you own shares in EIGH, I HIGHLY suggest you contemplate getting a certificate for your EIGH shares. It's worth a few bucks, isn't it?

[wormwood]

Alan. It is a shame you don't have more posts. You are right on. Your post is appreciated. EIGH knows about the short problem and so does EVERYONE else.

[janice shell]

Trying to suggest the lack of size on the reported short positions is meaningful is ludicrous and everyone reading this board knows it.

On the contrary, Alan, at least half the people posting here are aware that the NSS nonsense is just an excuse that's invariably used when a penny stock doesn't live up to expectations.

It's only down here in the Pinks that anyone has problems with Reg SHO or with the bi-monthly short interest reports.