InvestorsHub Logo

HighRider

10/24/10 8:52 PM

#38206 RE: moonshot57 #38204

I agree and to back that up, I'm going in for more tomorrow. So all of you sellers help me out.

ooag_long

10/25/10 12:05 AM

#38208 RE: moonshot57 #38204

agree, because there are lots of infringers (re upside). on the other hand post diac down side is likewise limited

downsideup

10/25/10 11:01 AM

#38224 RE: moonshot57 #38204

The other aspect is that the recent price history in the move from $0.03 to $0.18... IS history. Noting the volume in the trade since the news of an agreement between CLYW and T-Mobile to suspend the case... it seems pretty obvious that you can't assume you'll see exactly the same type of pattern in the trade again the next time. The next time there is news, that news will likely be a thing that the market, including a range of new participants, are already expecting. With the right news, I think there will be a lot of competition all trying to get in faster than the other guy.

Cougar6

10/25/10 7:35 PM

#38249 RE: moonshot57 #38204

I agree with you. The history of this stock is probably not applicable in the short run. But is things do not develop by mid November, I think they will be very applicable.

HighRider

10/25/10 8:06 PM

#38251 RE: moonshot57 #38204

Absolutely.

deet49

10/25/10 8:35 PM

#38252 RE: moonshot57 #38204

it will happen fairly rapidly

YES, YES AND YES!