Replies to post #37869 on Calypso Wireless (fka CLYW)

[cabel]

At this point we are trying to make educated guesses. You have made yours,..interesting,... just curious,... do you hold a position for just in case you are wrong ad the TM deal gets done?

[deet49]

2008 agreement stands for the t-moble case at the very least drago stays on as partner he's just a greedy pig and is trying for the whole pie can't blame him ASNAP is worth billions

[Sheepdog]

I believe you are wrong in this opinion. You were maybe correct when you said the original case is not the issue. I would agree with that. But then you go and say it would come back into play.

If the only issue is the 2008 agreement and Calypso prevails it would be the terms of the 2008 agreement owing to Daic LESS damages incurred by Calypso for those breaches.

Where could Calypso be right now if it signed the Acacia agreement in April 2008 for example? We could all be millionaires by now. Where would Calypso be right now if it could have negotiated a license agreement with T-Mobile in April of 2008 rather than being forced to file a lawsuit against T-Mobile?

I could go on and on.....

(I am out of posts for the day)

deet49...regarding your post #37875...LOL, and that would be the first time he breached or interfered with the agreement.

[HighRider]

I don't think you've factored the Fed Court in on this. They will not allow it to remain out there that long. It has already gone beyond their timeline for these cases, that's why they have the docket schedule. They didn't ask Tmob or Calypso, how long do you want this case to last, Fed Court told them what the timeline was going to be. Yes they have extended it to some degree, but it appears their time is running out. You can't just put the case in limbo for years, nor can they file endless meaningless motions etc. I think Tmob is looking at the state case as a factor to see how it will affect a deal, but other than that I don't think they are waiting. They would be stupid not to look at the state case and determine if any deal would be invalidated or present any future problems etc.

O.k. Word is out, they can't reverse the Original Judgment, we know that now, thanks.

Well negotiating a new settlement could be problematic if he is in control because he could just say you owe me $100 million and I want the patents in exchange. I think the court will have more to say on a settlement this time around. There is a point when reasonable attempts have been made and the court must intervene, that's their job.