InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 104
Posts 43482
Boards Moderated 4
Alias Born 02/13/2010

Re: conagra post# 37869

Monday, 10/18/2010 1:37:35 PM

Monday, October 18, 2010 1:37:35 PM

Post# of 60937
I believe you are wrong in this opinion. You were maybe correct when you said the original case is not the issue. I would agree with that. But then you go and say it would come back into play.

If the only issue is the 2008 agreement and Calypso prevails it would be the terms of the 2008 agreement owing to Daic LESS damages incurred by Calypso for those breaches.

Where could Calypso be right now if it signed the Acacia agreement in April 2008 for example? We could all be millionaires by now. Where would Calypso be right now if it could have negotiated a license agreement with T-Mobile in April of 2008 rather than being forced to file a lawsuit against T-Mobile?

I could go on and on.....

(I am out of posts for the day)

deet49...regarding your post #37875...LOL, and that would be the first time he breached or interfered with the agreement.

I have no humble opinions, but I do have opinions and those are what I express in my posts. BUT...I have been wrong before and likely will be wrong again so do your own research and don't blame me if you are too lazy to do so.

Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.