InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Sheepdog

10/11/10 3:28 PM

#29413 RE: chainma1l #29410

This is a crock of SHEECH.

1) This is only a motion and there are still the 2 petitions in intervention that the judge has to deal with, and

2) The Motion for dismissal is ONLY because there is allegedly a settlement agreed to THAT WE NEVER GET TO SEE. How do the shareholders know that Lanza didn't give all of the assets of BDGR to OMDA just to get himself off PERSONALLY at shareholder expense? (Of course the reverse could also be true - who knows what these two self-appointed self-serving dictators did?)

NOTHING HAS CHANGED except that Lanza is trying to pump a few more shares out. As far as I am concerned, the PR, being the half truth that it is, is proof of the mal-intentions of the company to misinform.

HYPE, BS, LIE AND STATE HALF TRUTHS -- THE LANZA WAY!!

BUT...WHAT ELSE CAN HE DO WHEN THE STOCK GOES TO NO BID BECAUSE OF HIS DILUTION?