If anyone has anything worth while to say about EVRM, I am always interest in listening. There is some blather posted on this board that is not worth listening to. Posts that are thrown up on the board and not defended because they are indefensible. Silly things like "Do you know the CEO of EVRM personally"???? "Will you vouch for the CEO of EVRM" These are silly questions. If one gets insider information on any position it is Illegal. If all else fails one can always criticize a bad key stroke, and tell the poster they spelled something wrong. Comical
Who said he was selling, I said the value of his stock is the same as ours yet he continues to move forward. What I cannot understand with people like you is why do you continue to post negative comments about a company that you own? Or do you?
I am not happy with the lack of communication from the company but exactly what has changed? Tell me how STS got on Fortune 500 websites and are even considered for TO's?
What you and others who post negatives don't seem to comprehend is that we are dealing with a company that has top secret clearance and isn't at liberty to provide information to shareholders until given that permission by someone else. These are former govt. personnel that have top secret clearance but aren't good at public communication. Our day will come. I just don't have a lot of use for the negative posts that really offer nothing other than pure negative speculation. Speculation serves no purpose thus I use the ignore function and will exercise that more in the days to come.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
