InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

wshaw14

10/03/10 11:33 AM

#51951 RE: jfburk #51950

jfburk, That is what I like. Factual posts. "who post negatives don't seem to comprehend is that we are dealing with a company that has top secret clearance and isn't at liberty to provide information to shareholders until given that permission by someone else. These are former govt. personnel that have top secret clearance but aren't good at public communication"

It seems some can not understand that details can not be disclosed without permission from the Primes. Nobody in their right mind would take a chance on it irritating the folks that hold the purse strings.

There is a huge difference in stating we won a task order and giving the details such as who, when, what, why and where.
icon url

nobullhere

10/03/10 11:34 AM

#51952 RE: jfburk #51950

So answer this. Does the secret clearance prevent them from posting a 2 second update to shareholders regarding the now past due newsletter and does the secret clearace prevent them from posting financials in a timely fashion? Did it prevent them from opening the CC to all and did it prevent them from not sending the first newsletter to many shareholder who did not get them.

What you say makes no sense. My comments are mostly aimed towards posters making silly, uninformed and downright inane posts.

I make no negative posts to the company business as I only post for accountability, transparancy and timely communication. I never have questioned, one time, STS or their perspective business on any posts here.

icon url

col_brewer

10/03/10 12:11 PM

#51974 RE: jfburk #51950

Evermedia Group has a Top Secret clearance ?

I know some of the officers have clearances

As posted by the company:

Top Secret
Richard Weitzel Pres/ CEO STS
Patricia Waldroop PR (Provisional ?)
Alex Nicoll


Secret
Jonathan Sym CEO