jfburk, That is what I like. Factual posts. "who post negatives don't seem to comprehend is that we are dealing with a company that has top secret clearance and isn't at liberty to provide information to shareholders until given that permission by someone else. These are former govt. personnel that have top secret clearance but aren't good at public communication"
It seems some can not understand that details can not be disclosed without permission from the Primes. Nobody in their right mind would take a chance on it irritating the folks that hold the purse strings.
There is a huge difference in stating we won a task order and giving the details such as who, when, what, why and where.