Replies to post #95791 on InterDigital Inc (IDCC)

[3GDollars]

Good point.

I think it re-inforce IDCC public stand that all 3G manufacturers are using/intersectiong IDCC's IPR. Most telling is that IDCC has alleged that the Ericy and SNE, the licensees, are infringing IDCC IPR and IDCC retain the right to sue their arse off.

[laranger]

Further, amigo, if you were able to find Ericy/SNE, can you also find the NOK of 1999?

[olddog967]

laranger: Since the licenses were for 2G only, IMO the wording means that any disputes relative to 3G are not covered.

In regard to your other msg, the only 1999 Nokia license that is publically available is the TDD Development Agreement

Nokia TDD Development Agreement
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/354913/000119312503016351/dex1055.htm

Nokia TDD Development Agreement - Amendment 1
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/354913/000119312503016351/dex1056.txt


I wonder what this means? It's in the agreements with both Ericy and SNE.
Also, could this same language be in the NOK agrement, which would explain the Delaware action?
The confusing language is as follows:
"neither party shall be compelled to submit to.......... arbitration.....any dispute......relating to Licensee's alleged infringement of ITC's Third Generation patents."

[ed_ferrari]

Isn't it basically saying that the agreement covers 2G only, and thus any 3G disputes would be covered by a totally separate agreement?