EIGH Read this post from Ransom Tuesday, September 28, 2010 5:47:09 PM
Re: Nitwit post# 64464 Post # of 72668
That's a lot of speculation - and there are a lot of 'ifs' in that last paragraph. So, what is he saying? It sounds as if he's saying Kelly is lying, plans to dilute (if the share price drops, and if the 'dividend' is actually a portion of the secret loan, and if he can't really be trusted ..), and especially that what we're all looking forward to isn't really a dividend from retained profits. Which is what the CEO has been saying all along.
Yeah, I guess these allegations might be well founded, but you'd have to tie the 'dividend' or whatever this distribution really is, to that collateral loan a little more carefully, and support the idea a little better that Kelly either doesn't know what he's doing, or is knowingly misrepresenting the facts and otherwise deceiving the shareholders.
Playing 'shareholder advocate' by presenting facts, warnings and theories that are arrived at with care are great and everyone appreciates it - but playing 'devil's advocate', being stupid, or whatever it is, by layering allegations, guessing, throwing together facts that might not really be connected, and using words like 'magical' to throw suspicion on, in this case, Kelly and 8000Inc is just getting out a red pen, but not really adding much. It doesn't build anything, it just creates suspicion, innuendo, and, well, allegations.
Why don't we just see whether Kelly delivers, while checking out facts as they come to light, but with care and patience? I mean, anyone can be sensational and toss doubt around with a quick cut-and-paste, while trying to look like they've really discovered something, right?
Ransom
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
