InvestorsHub Logo

ooag_long

09/25/10 12:47 PM

#36531 RE: HighRider #36524

because we now have the money counter ticking, you are missing the point this is not just on www.calypsowirelessinc.com its also on the russian post, the russian post is incorrect because of daic's bad faith, in the abscense of drago doing nothing the company has to attempt to seal the leak in order to claim financial loss, right now the loss is huge before the russian article the loss was arguable and nebulas now it is not, evasive action needs to be taken, as it stands now daic is on the hook for 40 Million from friday, i suspect that the fastest he could get the russian article down is by wensday or thursay that puts the loss (including treble damage award for keeping it up there in bad faith) at between 160 million and 200 million dollars tangable damage award / that is a 40 million dollar tangable (at 10 Million dollars per day that the russian article is up),to 50 Million dollar award based on 4 to 5 days plus trebble damages.

i repeat, to claim this the company must notice diaic immediately and then move for ex parte actions against his isp and the russian site to "stop the leak", if it takes untill the end of the first week of october so be it, then messer's williamson and daic even own more,

but the company needs to move now to stop the damage. This damage discovery is on the face of it new and no longer insidious, but obvious to calypso management and counsel and must be stopped immediately to minimize the damage done to the company since it is of such a huge extent and magnitude.

yes prior to friday the company could take the path of least resistance in going after drago, no longer, now its time to move for the jugular immediately sieze the moment, and stop their extortion cold,

It does not matter if drago shuts it down any more, he's incured HUGE MONITARY DAMAGES on the order that the man has claimed against calypso.

THE BOD SHOULD BE BREIFING THE EXPARTE MOTION NOW AND SUBMITTING IT FIRST THING MONDAY MORNING

qed

ooag_long

09/25/10 12:50 PM

#36532 RE: HighRider #36524

we are facing a bp deep water horizon problem w/ o the explosion, the company haa a responsibility to stop the leak now.

ooag_long

09/25/10 12:56 PM

#36534 RE: HighRider #36524

Management finally has proof that they are suffering significant on going damage from the web site they have two responsibilites to stop the damage and to seek compensation.

imho, the company needs to make that the threshold for preponderance, or is it clear and convincing evidence? imho this puts the company over the top in both categories

they cannot afford to let this go