I have to admit, based on the business history and success of Laramie, he might be a great choice to be the CDEO of SPKL. Thus, as a selfemployeed businessman by myself with international success of my company, I have to say, that you do not get such a person leading a compnay if you do not pay im well and correct for his efforts and his reputation. In this case it is, no doubt, one hundred times better to have such a guy leading SPKL insteed of a nobody in this scene! So, back to the critics, that Laramie might be paid too high by shares, I feel not able to agree with this critics: If a company has to suffer by bad economy or bad progress, no person with a great reputation will and has to work altruistic for such a compnay. Thus I state and correct myself: I prefer the company has to dilute....but finally, hopefully, will also be able to show 1000 restaurants doing revenues! It is true, the basic story has been be promising, and, as much as I see until now....it is a promising story with reasonable hopes for longterm success.....and Laramie could be the best motor for this!!!
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
