InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

texaswisdom

09/16/10 4:38 PM

#54454 RE: Mikey #54449

I like it...I like it a lot! Very nice day for EIGH...and good times ahead ;)
icon url

caltrader

09/16/10 4:46 PM

#54457 RE: Mikey #54449

"Due to the significant reported shareholder equity, should this cash dividend fall below $0.10 per share, the company reserves the right to convert this payment to a 1 for 10 (10%), stock dividend ensuring shareholder value and return.

The company has either option available to them.

Absolutely awesome. Unless you are short that is. LOL
icon url

Tirunesh

09/16/10 5:53 PM

#54502 RE: Mikey #54449

There are more tricks in the bag to account for all shares. I believe a big one will be used at just the right time in next 4 weeks. You all are only looking at the most simplistic scenario. More arrows still in the quiver. IMHO
icon url

beulah

09/16/10 8:11 PM

#54538 RE: Mikey #54449

If the retained earnings are $900,000+, and the OS is about 140,000 shares, then it would seem that 30% of the retained earnings would be about $300,000 and that would represent a cash dividend of about $.03. These are round numbers only, and if my math is reasonably correct, that would not meet the $.10 necessary for a cash dividend. Am I correct in this? I really hope not because the cash dividend would be best for all of us.
icon url

Cube

09/16/10 8:26 PM

#54542 RE: Mikey #54449

either way, when a 'dividend' is declared all brokers will be pinged for the absolute correct shares held. Enough said there Xbig. The levers are being put into place.
icon url

Mikey

09/23/10 11:23 PM

#60699 RE: Mikey #54449

Did you guys check this out?.....i posted it last week on the news....was anyone able to confirm this?

xbigshot1 Share Thursday, September 16, 2010 4:30:28 PM
Re: None Post # of 60700

re: dividends........it the dividend is a 'cash' dividend the shorts would be required to cover.........if in fact, the retained earnings of 30% do not meet the .10 pps price, the divy will be a 10% dividend of shareholder i/o via share distribution and if thats the case, short covering is not required....only on 'cash' dividends is covering required.......they will probably use the retained earnings to purchase the additional shares and distribute to shareholder of record on said date.....this 'appears' to be a 'divy' rather than a forward split.....i have a call into mr. kelly to get clarification......either way, when a 'dividend' is declared all brokers will be pinged for the absolute correct shares held......this would include nobo an obo.....all of them!

this is actually a pretty smooth move!

i am pretty sure all the above is correct.......