That's not right Bob. INIX is a result of the reverse split. To say that they have never done a reverse split is playing semantics. I know you did not say that, but it is misleading to say that INIX never did a reverse split.
It's true, it was INXR before the split, but it was the same company that now goes by the ticker INIX. It's quite common for companies to change their ticker symbol after an R/S. But it is still the same company after the ticker change.
Everyone knows I'm not a basher. I just like to keep the information accurate.
We're in total agreement. The point of my post was that a different name does NOT make a different company.