![](http://investorshub.advfn.com/images/default_ih_profile2_4848.jpg?cb=0)
Wednesday, September 15, 2010 11:31:48 AM
That's not right Bob. INIX is a result of the reverse split. To say that they have never done a reverse split is playing semantics. I know you did not say that, but it is misleading to say that INIX never did a reverse split.
It's true, it was INXR before the split, but it was the same company that now goes by the ticker INIX. It's quite common for companies to change their ticker symbol after an R/S. But it is still the same company after the ticker change.
Everyone knows I'm not a basher. I just like to keep the information accurate.
We're in total agreement. The point of my post was that a different name does NOT make a different company.
I thought the example I gave was pretty clear
![smile](/images/emoticon01.gif)
--
BobF
FEATURED Element79 Gold Corp Provides Update on Nevada Portfolio • Aug 23, 2024 8:00 AM
Maybacks Adds Award Winning Show to Its Lineup Discusses Maybacks Opportunity • AHRO • Aug 22, 2024 11:30 AM
North Bay Resources Announces First Gold Concentrate at Mt. Vernon Gold Mine, Assays 12 oz/ton Gold, 17.5 oz/ton Platinum, and 8 oz./ton Silver, Sierra County, California • NBRI • Aug 22, 2024 10:28 AM
All Things Mobile Analytic, Inc. Reports Major Growth with Over $11 Million in Revenue • ATMH • Aug 22, 2024 7:19 AM
Unitronix Announces Strategic Entry into Cryptocurrency Space • UTRX • Aug 21, 2024 10:00 AM
Mawson Finland Provides Update on Exploration Activities at Rajapalot • MFL • Aug 21, 2024 9:06 AM