InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

King Shaka

09/11/10 6:32 PM

#26386 RE: drpolk #26384

You seem to be well informed about the audit. Why is it that they don't tell you what it was about?

KS
icon url

thehawk72

09/11/10 10:03 PM

#26398 RE: drpolk #26384

This is why I see it as a pump.

According to you, this is the third audit, but
1. This is the first time an audit has ever been mentioned.
2. The mention of this audit happened on day 149 or 150.

So, the timing of the leak of this audit, only serves to keep the pps from crashing once the 150 day timeline was not met. And you continue to lead us on that this could in fact be related to the current application.

On day 151 to present, we have gotten posts stating
1. Give it a few more days or a couple weeks, since the FDA could have approved but paperwork takes time before releasing to the company.
2. Now other apps show up with approval on day 183.

These arguments could have much more validity if stated when the 150 day timeline was first put out there. Instead of, 150? 97%-100%? Great DD..Sept. 8th is it!!!
icon url

thehawk72

09/11/10 10:18 PM

#26400 RE: drpolk #26384

I do believe some on this board, but that number is declining rapidly. Same with the decisions made by this company. I will continue to hold a few shares, because when one has been in a dream for so long, one hates to wake up completely.

It's not total mistrust. My arguments against actions and words from Dean are not from my gut or made up, they are taken from actual history and in so doing, I state facts about communications Dean has made public. To me that is much better than pulling dates from thin air for the past year. I will give Bust some credit, at least he had some information to back up the 150.

All I have been trying to do is give a balance to the discussion here. Maybe there are still some out here that have all their eggs in this basket. As much as we would all like to believe, there are no guarantees how this will turn out!