InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 29
Posts 1670
Boards Moderated 2
Alias Born 08/19/2009

Re: drpolk post# 26384

Saturday, 09/11/2010 10:03:32 PM

Saturday, September 11, 2010 10:03:32 PM

Post# of 59551
This is why I see it as a pump.

According to you, this is the third audit, but
1. This is the first time an audit has ever been mentioned.
2. The mention of this audit happened on day 149 or 150.

So, the timing of the leak of this audit, only serves to keep the pps from crashing once the 150 day timeline was not met. And you continue to lead us on that this could in fact be related to the current application.

On day 151 to present, we have gotten posts stating
1. Give it a few more days or a couple weeks, since the FDA could have approved but paperwork takes time before releasing to the company.
2. Now other apps show up with approval on day 183.

These arguments could have much more validity if stated when the 150 day timeline was first put out there. Instead of, 150? 97%-100%? Great DD..Sept. 8th is it!!!

All I want is Patience, and I want it NOW!!!!!!!!!