InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

romjn5

09/10/10 10:07 AM

#15223 RE: NextStage1 #15222

Could this be another Skymark game to bring the price down? Could they be buying up shares outside of Alberta? Could they be getting someone else to buy share for them?

After real finacial numbers come out and a new product this PPS will increase and who will have made money? Not the poor guys that sold in fear.

This is just my opinion. There is always another way to look at things. You have to admit that Skymarks reputation has not been to good for a while now and their picks have suffered as a result.

GLTA. I will see this out till the end as I have no choice. Lost to much already.
icon url

Outlaw

09/10/10 10:48 AM

#15225 RE: NextStage1 #15222

Yes they are progressing, and it was implied in my posts!

I was thanking them (SEC) for personally contacting, and explaining their position! They didnt have to do that!

You have to look at their perspective, and from their point of veiw they're protecting the public. I agree with them ONLY to the extent, that someone should have looked into Canadian law before moving forward with the promotion. Hindsight's 20/20!

I have no doubts about TSHO, "in time" its gonna make money for you, in my opinion!

And when the PR's come out, it will climb again!

No where did I say anything contrary to this company's business plan, or the course of action that they've taken to date. If the ASC's reckless in their implications, TSHO's lawyers should be addressing them! Are they, as far as their law is concerned protecting investors? Yes, of course! Just because I openly thank them for contacting me, and see the case through their eyes, does not mean that I'm throwing out all the progress made by TSHO to date!


icon url

investor_2009

09/10/10 12:44 PM

#15228 RE: NextStage1 #15222

ASC is right and wrong. Right because what they are investigating if G/S is real or not, but rather, was there a stock manipulation.

Wrong because TSHO or PBEC was 'supposed to know' what's going on. Yes, sure they should have. How about this - Shouldn't ASC have been supposed to know that there is a broker, who is not licenced to sell, still selling for last 2 years!! Well, they are regulators, and you are not supposed to question them!! Big B/S!

Even if TSHO hired the services of an 'analyst' (now we know they were not analyst but bunch of b*****), is it illegal? Just like there is no justification when the stock is 10c, how can there be justification when stock is 1.62? In the end its a capitalist market silly!!!

Just a spumpers are investigated, why not the shorters? Are they registered in Alberta to give their recommendations that this would go to sub penny? This is a maze of crap!! Irrationality at its peak
icon url

tmj

09/11/10 12:32 AM

#15238 RE: NextStage1 #15222

guys do you understand this is not about tsho but rather about the manipulation of the stock by skymark?

this is where the investigation comes in..and if tsho did pay skymark to "promote" their stock then they are just as guilty!!!

it does not matter if products are real or not -but it is against the sec to manipulate hte stock price by "pumping"!!

and therefore asc restricted skymark and the affiliates from trading tsho shares..so wht i believe is that if skymark had any shares left they would have been sold by now and tht is why there is significant decline in the stock price!!