Replies to post #9549 on Q stock Traders

[MVIR]

Yes. I agree with you 95%. But with some 5% company I am not agree with you. I will give you simple 2 company examples that had no news for 1 year, no website, no much trading activities. Still now trading with all the things News, active, website.

1. VRMLQ
2. QSGIQ

Issue here is once you get all news and DD then price won't be that cheap with 00s.

We came here to make money. Good luck to all.

[exlud]

Would you add a reasonable expectation that the company will emerge from bankruptcy to that list? It would seem that most of the better Q plays seem to have two things going for them, significant tangible assets and a reasonable probability that they will emerge from bankruptcy. Weather the commons survive the process is another matter, but these criteria seem to help.
As sort of an aside, I'd like to say that I've been very impressed with the DD that folks like yourself, Madclown, and others have shared on these plays. The frank discussion of assets, MORs, items on the docket, etc. really helps paint a better picture of what is going on.
As for the Q mentioned that started this thread, well, I thought the pictures summed it up! Q or not, folks slowly accumulating then pumping a few high points (or outright lies) is dishonest at best and possibly even criminal.
Maybe in addition to deleting posts and putting folks in Ihub jail they could add a permanent "snakeoil" tag to the posters that are trying to sell it.

[Madclown]

Here is my post from over at the ATWOQ board that was deleted for some reason. Must have been an accident or it somehow got lost within all of the tremendous DD over there so I thought i'd put it up over here as well.

"I got a good laugh out of both blunders over there. I like to think of it as an Ocean's Eleven type event but instead of the big heist actually being pulled off where you clean out the entire vault, the team members start robbing the casino guests instead and the whole operation is just blown up.

How is this FLD play going to work when it has been front loaded by the very people that were dispatched from the board because they couldn't be trusted? It makes no sense to go thru with it unless everyone is in on the shenanigans. There are hundreds of Q stocks and thousands of penny stocks to pick from and this one is tainted bigtime. But still it remains the pick?

If these guys were really upset about the leakage then the best move would be to make another pick and leave the "loose lips" holding the bag. Wouldn't it?

Does anyone know why it makes perfect sense to change the pick but also why that isn't the move that will be made? I'll give you three guesses, but I hope no one needs to make use of #2 or #3..."