InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

algaefan

09/04/10 1:21 PM

#99815 RE: Bfife #99814

Our favorite little rapper also assumes in his hypothetical situation that Apple, Dell, and IBM do not really take cost into consideration. Trust me those companies will take the lower cost widget especially when it is of the same or higher quality which is what BEHL has.

There widget is produced in a controlled environment and not as subject to contamination like Widgets grown in an open pond where birds poop in and all sorts of other little critters can also find there way in.

The equation also states that company XXXX has the shiny widget which is false. If they were going for shiney the production cost would also be more. It is the other companies with expensive tubes for their pbrs that are 'shiney'. BEHL is the maker of unshiney high quality Widgets.

icon url

eminem

09/04/10 1:32 PM

#99816 RE: Bfife #99814

8nt2brite. Thanks for the balanced response, I can tell from your posts that you are a rational person, and not one of the crazies ot KoolAid swallowers here. Indeed what I posted was completely hypothetical and the "IBM not needing anymore" etc was just to make my hypothetical point in the few minutes you get before you must finish writing.

On BEHL though I just don't understand a lot of what is going on. At one point their "widget" was fuel, then it was PBR's, then it was omega-3's and now it's astaxanthin. It is difficult to know what is real and so you have to guess. The PR's have touted omega-3 for maybe a year and suddenly it drops off the radar without explanation. We are left to assume that the deal is off, or that BEHL cannot grow the algae, or cannot extract the oil or something - why not inform the shareholders "BEHL has decided not to pursue the production of omega-3 oil because XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX and instead to redouble resources on astaxanthin production because XXXX XXXXX"? THAT would be transparency and build trust - in the wake of inner Mongolia, South Carolina, North California, South America, China, Indian tribes etc. It would also be reassuring if they actually produced one of their projected products and had it certified IMO.

Also stating that the A/S will not be increased and it is repeatedly often less than a couple of weeks after stating that it won't be. And dealing exclusively with an unknown company id either a brilliant move - or really bad. And we the public are left to make that judgement. IMO