InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 1
Posts 540
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/01/2010

Re: Bfife post# 99814

Saturday, 09/04/2010 1:32:50 PM

Saturday, September 04, 2010 1:32:50 PM

Post# of 111729
8nt2brite. Thanks for the balanced response, I can tell from your posts that you are a rational person, and not one of the crazies ot KoolAid swallowers here. Indeed what I posted was completely hypothetical and the "IBM not needing anymore" etc was just to make my hypothetical point in the few minutes you get before you must finish writing.

On BEHL though I just don't understand a lot of what is going on. At one point their "widget" was fuel, then it was PBR's, then it was omega-3's and now it's astaxanthin. It is difficult to know what is real and so you have to guess. The PR's have touted omega-3 for maybe a year and suddenly it drops off the radar without explanation. We are left to assume that the deal is off, or that BEHL cannot grow the algae, or cannot extract the oil or something - why not inform the shareholders "BEHL has decided not to pursue the production of omega-3 oil because XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX and instead to redouble resources on astaxanthin production because XXXX XXXXX"? THAT would be transparency and build trust - in the wake of inner Mongolia, South Carolina, North California, South America, China, Indian tribes etc. It would also be reassuring if they actually produced one of their projected products and had it certified IMO.

Also stating that the A/S will not be increased and it is repeatedly often less than a couple of weeks after stating that it won't be. And dealing exclusively with an unknown company id either a brilliant move - or really bad. And we the public are left to make that judgement. IMO