MyMoney: I couldn't find Weby's post paralleling Wave to 3M but Cricket2 did and I think it's appropriate relating to your stellar post. Jeff
"I believe it was Weby that first made the reference to wavx as being like the 3M commercials i.e. we don’t make the trusted devices you own... we make the trusted devices you own better."
Posted by: cricketcricket In reply to: GreenWavx who wrote msg# 2262 Date:8/1/2003 10:44:22 PM Post #of 68674
Hello GreenWavx yes I do. WAVX is CRITICAL to the survival of TCG imho as they give it elegant unparalleled functionality. I do not believe INTC gets to own the "glue" that holds TCG together. Besides I think this affords INTC the ability to "shield" themselves as this is not an INTC "security" solution. I believe it was Weby that first made the reference to wavx as being like the 3M commercials i.e. we don’t make the trusted devices you own... we make the trusted devices you own better. INTC makes MANY wonderful peripherals that I believe they would love to integrate wavx ip into from ethernet cards to switches/routers. INTC came into my office looking to sell us their routing solutions for our WAN but I selected CSCO. Will I make that same decision again now that INTC may be offering a trusted infrastructure.... CSCO is very conscious of secure mobile computing... but guess what.. so IS INTC... and I sense from those meetings they would LOVE to eat CSCO's lunch.... perhaps csco or adtran should be knocking on wavx's door. I know I know the recent news has nothing to do with nic's or other peripherals.. but it will imho! Kindest Regards, C2