Hasher, you think that was "an attempt to not be censored"? Sorry, but that post was purely tongue-in-cheek. Notice what I wrote:
I suppose some might consider it a "personal attack"
and then read the very first words of the flame <g>.
In any case, wish I could give credit to the author of that flame; I lifted it from S.I. over a year ago.
You have, however, put forth an interesting idea -- "Pre-Approved Flames". Something to take up with iHub management.
AK