InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

EarnestDD

08/15/10 10:19 AM

#85495 RE: jimtash #85494

Real PR's about real deals ... can stand the scrutiny.
Unfortunately ... RCCH's PR's can NOT.
jmo
icon url

marketmann

08/15/10 11:33 AM

#85496 RE: jimtash #85494

But if they release PR and PR, wouldn't that be construed as fluff by many here?

based on past PR's that are over 2 years old, it is fluff. not one word from prior PR's has happened yet. has it? that is why managements PR's are fluff and BS.
icon url

train

08/15/10 11:57 AM

#85498 RE: jimtash #85494

PR's are definitely needed. Otherwise, people will feel that management no longer exists. Perhaps this is the case here. I hope not.

Charlie
icon url

ThSeeker

08/16/10 7:17 AM

#85519 RE: jimtash #85494

I think if they released PRs with confirmable substance most would be glad and view it with skeptical optimism. One or two may not believe anything positive. Who can blame them. But to hold off real news for a few is stupid excuse some are making up to justify their optimism and make the constant waiting bearable. BUT if any mildly positive news comes out that can't be verified it would certainly be met with hostility. At best would be called fluff. Rightfully so we seen it before and has any of it be proven true. Very little has. Most appeared true but over time has been proven false or has become less credible. They have a steep him of doubt to tear down before they will be believe if they ever begin to turn this around.