the bottom line is that, there are some facts & many theories, imho, even if somone is absolutely correct about a scam, untill proven they need to show some humility, and use terms like jmho, imho, etc, in the investment community, this is the gold standard and the harder the punch one smacks w/ their criticism the more necessary it is, if the company were the only people reading it i would not care so much, but when its shareholders seeing it, the hard jab to the gut regarding the cold relatively proven reality as demonstrated in a post needs to be buffered by courtsey
granted we all make mistakes, but to consistently bash w/ out showing any courtsey whatsoever ultimately defines the measure of the man as being very small-imho
hey, if some one just shows up and says "what a pos" and nothing more jmho is pretty much implied, but in a huge "logical" (in quotes because so often there is nothing but unspoken logic built on one or two shaky facts) construction jmho / imho need to be involved, it just is not right to do it any other way and i really ask posters to join me in trying to ignore those that repeatly / blatently / etc. opt to ignore this time honored time tested gold standard of posting
glta
-real