Replies to post #93332 on Intel Corp (INTC)

[fastpathguru]

Your research skills served you well in analyzing the decision denying class certification. Only a quibbler like FPG would suggest that the very complex decision could be summarized with a single line. If he would simply read the bold section headings then he might understand why the plaintiffs failed to obtain class certification and are also doomed to even establish harm of any kind for a PC buyer.

I never "suggested" any such thing. I quoted Poppiti's own summary.

Which is reinforced by the rest of his ruling.

Which I read.

Even beyond the "bold section headings."

fpg

PS: I see you too don't feel like supporting your claim with any of your own rationale, or references to specific material in the ruling. And have not bothered to rebut my own specific claims. Hard to commit to an actual, verifiable claim, huh?

[fastpathguru]

Tenchu: "Your "claim" amounts to splitting hairs..."
Windsock: "Only a quibbler like FPG would suggest..."

I guess the Mothership has handed down the new talking points...

fpg

[Cesare Souryo]

yes, There is no harm to the consumers even if the consumers did not see any AMD based products in their nearby stores. It was AMD's own fault why AMD did not have money to expand its fabs, so AMD has enough capacity to supply the whole markets worldwide.