Replies to post #2274 on QSGI, Inc.(fka QSGI)

[HokieHead]

All the DD done here, in the stickys, by everyone else and you are asking the question about a gonzo post? Geesh...

[21Reggie33]

read the DD provided, read the pitches, that is YOUR interpretation, which is different than the majority on this board. Not saying that is bad but everything I have read points to having the shares remain intact....MODS? Am I correct in this?

[matoutus]

I didn't post that ...but I think the word "into" is meant as a verb ...and not as a description of the net result .

[matoutus]

its a valid question imo ...I was confused by that also .

[HDOGTX]

Not IMO, why else fight for the shares as stated in 8k on 7-20, beacause they have futurre plans for them as they hold majority positions and large vested intrest in the emergence from BK!

[tchalla]

actually, if there is any truth to that, it would explain the reason for why they didn't want riconda to have any position or equity in the newly formed entity. as i have always contended, imo, the 8k involving riconda was never about protecting commons, as there is no incentive for management to do so. they barely even own any shares in the existing company. they would be best served from a bk perspective, to simply cancel the commons and take a new path with their business entirely. all imho