InvestorsHub Logo

deri21

07/22/10 9:37 AM

#29598 RE: gail #29597

Mark claims to have just bought the shell free of any assets or lawsuits. Since we should have had name change or ticker symbol change wonder if this is part of the hold up. I contacted Mark last friday about MIKP but was unable to get any info about ADCS.

ib12u

07/22/10 11:10 AM

#29600 RE: gail #29597

Forget about it! any shareholders of the so-called Previous company (which also used 'ADCS') has nothing to do with the new owners. The lawsuit is with the previous owners, not the new ones. THEIR shares aren’t even sold yet and all YOUR shares are or will be worthless here. you all will be needing to buy NEW shares with the NEW ownership.

MONEY is and always IS the problems here.

Which is the better buck (in their favor) wink!, either blow-off all the shares of the old owners or assume them and write-off the insider's losses after the outsiders, (you all), sell your shares as soon as there's a BID. LOL!

It's all about the MOOOLLAAHH!

mAjOr dAmAgE

07/22/10 12:33 PM

#29601 RE: gail #29597

It's against the company, not any "owners." A shell comes with liabilities. Changing the name and the officers doesn't escape liens, lawsuits, taxes, criminal actions, etc. It's the same company.

It probably doesn't matter much to the shell owners since their business plan is to print shares of stock and sell them to gamblers. That's how Brian Kistler makes money.

And, yes, Kistler is still in charge. Everyone knows he's involved with MIKP/ACDU. You can see he's the guy who paid Shakerzzz to pump Mike the Pike. It's all about selling shares, and Kistler is a diluting pig.